Every version of the argument

Ten units, on Kawasaki's structure

Both decks measured against the 10/20/30 structure, then merged. The problem compresses from three units to one carrying the will, the proof and the money. Precedent moves after the problem. Adds the value proposition, the go-to-market and the landscape, which no earlier version had, and organises the middle as feasible, viable and desirable.

The transition as the spine

Rebuilt around extraction to stewardship to cultivation, and around the fact that the shift has already started on its own. Drops the second person and every statement of what a thing is not. Adds five computed figures, three verified precedents, and the corrected extent. Twelve units, which was two too many.

First cut with photographs in it

The first version to use the committed photography rather than argue in type. Addressed the reader directly, opened on their own project, and led with what the work is not. All three were wrong and all three were fixed in v0.2. The cost model and the certification research landed while it was being built.

The People's Posidonia, Climate Week

The deck actually presented, and the bar everything since has been held against. Eleven slides, 38 images, and the thesis that names demand rather than science as the bottleneck. The binary is too large to commit; the narrative, the numbers and the speaker notes are transcribed.

What the week produced

Eighteen units, 32 images, and computed charts. The highest-production artifact in the repository and the one whose build pipeline every later deck reuses. Every unit carries a medium: a photograph means it happened, a capture means the tool runs, a chart means the number is sourced.

The People's Posidonia, co-branded

The Climate Week pitch re-cut as something a person reads alone, with the speaker notes converted to reveals and the tools wired in as links. The worked example the document system was designed against.

The client-neutral cut

The same argument with the co-branding stripped and every ask figure removed, so a partner cut can branch from it rather than from a version already addressed to someone.

Fishermen as stewards

The named-partner cut, and the first artifact to put the interface layer at the centre: the four screens, the pairing, and the day on the water with the fourth panel deliberately empty.

Fifteen units, no pictures

Every gate passed and the result was not worth looking at, which is the finding that started the whole redesign. Nine citations, six working tools linked, and zero images across fifteen units. Kept as the reference case for why correctness is not quality.

Co-run Pollica

The partnership proposal, fact-checked against the evidence ledger. Twenty units and the leanest word count of any deck here, and still carrying no imagery.

The protocol, audience-neutral

The argument that the map is old, the instruments are cheap, and what is missing is a packaged method with an ownership split. Deliberately written for no particular reader, which is both its use and its limit.